The big question: Is there a God? And, ultimately, what difference does it make? My religious experience is as weird as it is rich and full. I understand the concept of faith because as a youth, I had it. The strong belief in something without requiring proof. I knew as surely as I knew anything that God was there and that when I prayed, I was talking to God. In the years since, my faith has degraded to hope, and even that is sketchy. The simple and certain fact is that if there is no God, it doesn’t matter. There would be no eternity of regret or happiness, nor anything else of a cognitive nature. It would simply be lights out. The possibilities, on the other hand, if there is a God, are endless, from an eternity of bliss, to becoming one with all others, depending on the faith you follow. But in terms of how it affects us here in the life we know, whether there actually is a God or not, makes no difference. Millions of prayers offered by the most pious among us, go unanswered. Rush Limbaugh dies of cancer, Islam continues to expand and grow, millions die of starvation, thousands of children go missing, still, the praying continues.
Whaever the reality may be in terms of God’s actual existance, the belief in a God, is, on the other hand, a completely different matter. We’ve recently been going through a period during which the belief in God has been fading significantly. A period that illuminates for us the value that resides in belief. Consider the ideology that has spread worldwide, which we refer to as “liberalism,” although it has nothing to do with what liberalism is. The father of classic liberalism was John Locke, an English philosopher from the late 1600s. His was a concept that emphasizes individual rights, liberty, and the cooperation of the governed. Where modern “liberalism” differs from his ideal rests in his idea that our rights are natural. (Recommended reading: “Two Treatises of Government ~John Locke) Locke listed the right to life, liberty, and property. Thomas Jefferson substituted happiness for property to extend importance to matters beyond personal wealth. In classical liberalism, these rights were seen as granted by God and thereby beyond the authority of government to remove or modify them. Modern liberals, on the other hand, have a much more complex view, but place government at the head of not only protecting and distributing these rights, but in deciding what these rights are. They being defined and directed by one’s government. A concept that is imperative in the promotion of communism, thus the importance of atheism in the ideologies of Marx, Lenin, Castro, Stalin, Che Guevara…
While moving away from the Godly premise in terms of rights, we also moved away from Godly concepts in terms of behavior. With no God and no scriptural significance to sway us, things like population lose spiritual significance. Rather than spiritual entities, people have nothing to elevate themselves above anything else. Thus your little girl has no more value than a canary, outside of your personal feelings towards her. Abortion, rather than being the sin of murdering unborn human beings, is sold as a positive. Good for the mothers, good for the child who might be born to negative circumstances, and good for society at large. Since 1973 well over 65 million unborn children have been murdered in America alone! Over 20 million worldwide so far this year! We have leftist politicians working to force American taxpayers to fund abortions worldwide!
We also have the very people who claim an affinity for feminism supporting the prejudiced action of allowing men to compete against women in athletics. Somehow, they labor under the illusion that a man wanting to be a woman makes it so. It is both amusing and horrifying that liberals asked to define and describe what a woman is. can’t (won’t) do so. “A woman is anyone who wants to be a woman.” To these amazing geniuses, X and Y chromosomes are irrelevant. Being a woman, to them has nothing to do with the ability to have a baby, nothing to do with the menstrual cycle, and nothing to do with having a vagina.
I love watching Charlie Kirk interviewing students on university campuses, asking the question, “What is a woman?” Very rarely does one of them come up with an answer that has anything to do with reality. To the children on our university campuses, a woman is a person who calls him/her/itself a woman. They do have the wisdom to note that calling oneself a walrus is absurd, but that absurdity ends when it comes to the difference between men and women. Who would’ve imagined a time in which, or a population for whom, defining what a woman would become so difficult?
Another of the great mysteries is teaching children that they can and should choose their sex. Allowing children who are too young to know what sexual preference is, or even to care about it, and convincing them that they should be the sex that they aren’t. Jimmy plays with Barbie dolls so, obviously, we much cut off his penis and put him on a hormone regimen, doing irreparable damage to the child upon whom it is applied. Turning little girls into boys presents a much more complicated problem, but that doesn’t stop ‘em.
This absurd concept that there is no real difference between men and women brings us to the ludicrous position we are in right now, in which men are allowed to compete against women in sports! Thus we have women’s athletic records be crushed by men pretending to be women. A concept so absurd it’s not only difficult for a rational, cognative person to comprehend, it is dangerous for the female athletes being forced to compete against men. The solution seems simple, just refuse to compete. However we are talking about girls whose life’s ambition has been to compete. To simply sit out events is out of the question. Her athletic record is corrupted, and beyond that, in the bizarre Marxist educational world we suffer with today, these ladies are punished! We have cases here in America in which a female athlete who refused to compete against a man has been disqualified!
All of this is as pure a form of discrimination as one could imagine. This fits in nicely with the history of the demonicrat party in America, which entered the Civil War to keep Black Americans in slavery. Who fought to keep both Black and female Americans from voting. Who went to absurd lengths in the attempt to stop the passage of the Civil Rights Amendments. Going as far as using firehoses and attack dogs against children! Of course, they now claim that Republicans have since become Demonicrats and vice versa in one of the most easily disprovable lies ever foisted upon American society.
“Some are evil, some are stupid, some are evil AND stupid… There exist people on earth who are just plain evil, who will destroy other people’s lives for their own personal gain. That describes the Democratic Party leadership” (Mark Lewis – townhall.com). There are those, including me, who feel like this evil is inspired by something rather dark and of a purely spiritual nature. Were there some way to apply logic to the absurdities, the battle against civil rights, the boys can be girls nonsense, the drive to abort as many children as possible, but there is no sane logic to apply. As an old biker (NO, not the spandex variety), I’m not one you’d expect to see things from a religious perspective, but I don’t know where else to look. When I refer to them as demonic-rats, it’s well beyond humorous mudslinging, it’s the only suitable logic I can see.
Don’t get me wrong, as an academic, I became friends with many demonicrats who seem to be fine and intelligent people, but they all have one thing in common. While they get along with me very well (I’m guessing that has something to do with me being a long haired, disabled hippie in a wheelchair), they won’t even attempt to discuss their liberal viewpoints. They just roll their eyes, say, “oh Bacon,” and walk away. These aren’t mean, evil, or stupid people, as one would expect them to be based on the ideology they support. They are fine, wonderful people.
Interestingly, as a biker, I’ve had a lot of friends who are genuine outlaws, yet their political ideology is quite the opposite of that of the academics. They organize in groups to support ideals such as Bikers Against Child Abuse, and Bikers for Trump (both of which I’m a member of). The concepts the liberals hold are looked upon as a joke. There is no way a male biker would compete against a woman in a physical competition, with the possible exception of drinking whiskey. It doesn’t take much imagination to visualize the biker reaction to the sexual mutilation of children!
Which of these groups would a belief in God affect? And, what effect would that have upon this country? And what are we to do? Pray!
~Bacon
ibaconi 